Eric Janszen kinda gets it

His " gold buy-and-hold thesis" has been firing on all cylinders since 2001. Clearly he 'gets' economics, so it's no surprise that, except for a little bit of philo-semitic coloring [what's wrong with "radical social reform along racial lines" for White folks anyway, as opposed to, say, Israelis?], he understands that our New Asian Overlords, free of Jews, are finishing the work Hitler started. Think where we could have been if he had been allowed to succeed back then, and Rosenfeld's bunglers [whose false solutions to pseudo-problems still define the field of public discourse] had been sent back to Bialystock!

This year younger, more liberal, American and European educated Chinese leaders face off against the conservative old guard that rose to power after Mao. In the balance is the future of China's economic model based as it is on a combination of mercantilism, central planning, and finance-economics within the repressive political cauldron of totalitarianism. China's form of state-directed capitalism [is] unique in history except perhaps for Nazi Germany in the 1930s. The rapid recovery of Germany under Nazi rule far outpaced the US in the 1930s. The relatively swift recovery motivated US and British industrialists to pour capital into Germany, much as US and European investors giddily shovel capital into communist China. They chose to compartmentalize Hitler's promise of radical social reform along racial lines as an awkward atom in an otherwise promising political and economic molecule. ... Had the Nazis not been murderous, racist megalomaniacs [!] then perhaps a kinder, gentler form of Germany's state-directed capitalism could, in theory, have evolved to unite Europe and out-compete the US decades before the European Union.

Not, of course, murderous, racist megalomaniacs but brave, plucky little allies

"For a concise, readable summary of iTulip concepts developed over the past 12 years and a vision of a challenging next decade and how to navigate it, read Eric Janszen's 2010 book The Postcatastrophe Economy: Rebuilding America and Avoiding the Next Bubble"

A Word for Now

Final preparations for The Book are underway [and for the next as well!] so in the meantime, something to ponder, for Turd Fergesun's website:

Cash on hand

Submitted by Smiddywesson on February 1, 2012 - 1:43pm.

A real crisis event of the magnitude to affect whether we should have cash or not will include a bank holiday. Some bank holidays will include zero access to your accounts, others will involve partial access with caps on how much you can withdraw each day. I would imagine caps on withdrawals are more likely, but that's a guess based on central banking having a long time to plan for this.

Other than having enough to buy groceries for a few weeks, and pay my rent, I don't keep a lot of cash on hand. I have plenty of metallic change, but no more paper money than is necessary. If I had any extra, I would buy silver with it. I think this may be a mistake.

Cash will eventually become worthless like your accounts, but so what? The bigger concern is in a doomsday financial meltdown, there will be no way to pay employees. How long do you suppose the local Walmart employees will show up in that case? With insufficient staffing, how many of these companies will refuse to open their doors? The last time around (1930s), there were mom and pop companies to extend credit to their neighbors (my grandfather lost his grocery store that way). Those small stores are gone, and the managers of the companies that replaced them don't have the authority to extend you credit to eat. This line of reasoning applies to shipping & distribution. Without letters of credit and loans, and without the employees to move the food, the shelves go bare in three days just like in the Japan earthquake. Sorry folks, due to Zero Inventory and Just-In-Time-Delivery, everything comes to a screeching halt without the banks.

In a dollar collapse, every little bit of cash that's not in your account can be quickly converted for something tangible. Many employees will show up to work as usual because they won't know initially they will never be paid. With the credit cards not working, only the people with cash will be able to buy anything, leaving you with the pick of a rapidly diminishing food supply and any gold/silver jewelry that hasn't been re-priced yet. When a bank holiday hits, everything priced in dollars will be under priced. Most people know nothing about these events, so the majority won't catch on for a few days.

Bright Lights, Big Nothing

My review of

Andy Nowicki’s Under the Nihil

“Our bodies come and go, but this blood stays forever” — Otis B. Driftwood

Another free sneak peek at our forthcoming Super Terrific Happy Book -- enjoy!

More Aryan than Human: The Return of Repressed White Wisdom in Rob Zombie’s Firefly Family Films

0.14 - Dwight Schrute!

Shameless Public Posturing

Interview with James J. O’Meara

Editor’s Note:

Before beginning this interview, I knew very little about James J. O’Meara. Based simply on his writings, I would describe him as a New Right/Radial Traditionalist-oriented literary and cultural critic residing in New York City. He is a highly valued contributor to Counter-Currents/North American New Right. He has also published in journals ranging from Alexandria to FringeWare Review to Judaic Book News. His own blog is Where the Wild Boys Are, with the arresting subtitle “Aryan Futurism, Heavy Metal Entheogenic Mysticism, and pitiless hordes of adolescent warriors in rainbow thongs.” At the very least, I hope to get an explanation of that!

Thank You, Mask Man!

A busy end of the year, with temp, at least, employment, and the final writings for the forthcoming book. Start saving your nickles and dimes!

I had wanted to respond to Justin Raimondo's disgusting attempt to throw the early, good ol' National Review under the integrated bus in order to "defend" his boy Ron Paul from charges of ray-zism from the current, neo-conned rag posing as its descendent, but here Stuff Black People Don't Like comes to my aid by saying much the same as I would about a similar smear from LewRockwell.com [hmm, co-ordination from the libertarian echo chamber, anyone?]

So, in closing, Dr. LiLorenzo is a useful idiot of the strange Ron Paul Cult. He wrote a glowing review of a book that argued the dismantling of South Africa's Apartheid system had horrible consequences for white people there, and he stated that that will soon happen in America for white people too. Yet he chastises National Review for daring to have once defended white rights. You know, one of these days people are going to start asking when an actual group will come along that dares does defend white rights in Black-Run America (BRA). It will happen spontaneously, and it will happen without any contributions from those bemoaning collectivism as some form of racism.
The Libertarians may not be neo-conned, but always remember, they are thoroughly Judeo-Conned as they proceed to tear down every vestige of White culture in the name of "individual rights" defined exclusively as the Judaic "right to buy and sell" anything and everything.

Including, the USA.

The Paulites are "against" government-sponsored pro-Black measures, but equally against pro-White measures. Thus, as SBPDL says, at best, useful idiots.

As we've pointed out here before, Paulites may be "radical" enough to oppose the Fed Reserve, but their "solution" is not the Prussian Socialism of Spengler or Hitler, but rather, precisely the opposite: a return to the "gold standard."

And who owns the gold?


Thanks for the blog, Mask Man!

Fuck You, GI Joe

Never heard of "re-hypothecation" before? [Microsoft spellchecker hasn't]. Ho Hum. Surely you've read our blog's insistence, over and over, that the so-called "science" of economics is simply Talmudic hocus-pocus to loot the goyim?

That's right, you have to pay the bankers real money, earned by the sweat of your brow [if you're lucky] while they take your property -- real estate, brokerage accounts, retirement funds -- and re-mortgage it infinitely. And if the bets they make with your property turn sour, you pay the bookie.

What's interesting is, the City of London connection. I recall some internet conspiracy talk about the City being not part of the UK, etc. but it hardly matters, as Max notes. In the bigger picture, though, it's sweet to note that

UK = City of London = Rothschilds

NS Germany = enemy of bankers = "greatest evil in history"

Now do you understand what WWII was all about?

Update:

The City is a feudal relic that escapes all genuine regulation within the United Kingdom. Even if only because it is a huge financial center that too few controllers "control", supported by the extensive network of tax havens created from the confetti of the former British Empire. For information, France Télévisions has just broadcast a remarkable report on the City on 11/2011. One could say that the City is a kind of “pirate” base like the Barbary corsairs that the European powers finally mastered by military campaigns in the nineteenth century, after centuries of piracy and smuggling of all kinds.